Obesity

City-Level Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Youth Body Mass Index Percentile

JAMA Netw OpenPublished Cohort study

Main finding · Mean change in BMI percentileResult — go to the resultDifference-in-differences −1.64 percentage points 95% CI −3.10 to −0.17

Authors' conclusion

In this cohort study, SSB excise taxes were associated with lower BMI percentile among youth. Policymakers should consider implementing SSB excise taxes to prevent or reduce youth overweight and obesity and, ultimately, chronic disease, particularly among children younger than 12 years.

Study context

Population
Kaiser Permanente members aged 2 to 19 years at baseline with continuous residence in selected California cities and ≥1 pretax and ≥1 posttax body mass index (BMI) in the electronic health record; 2009–2020
Participants
44,771 vs 345,428
Exposure
Cities with sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise taxes vs matched control cities
  • SSB tax citiesn = 44,771
  • Control citiesn = 345,428reference
Outcome
CDC age- and sex-specific BMI percentiles and percentage of youth with overweight or obesity
Follow-up
Before tax implementation through 4 to 6 years after
Methodological detailsdifference-in-differences analysis, demographically matched control cities, synthetic control sensitivity analysis
  • Difference-in-differences analysis
  • Demographically matched control cities
  • Synthetic control sensitivity analysis

Main finding

Mean change in BMI percentile · after SSB tax implementation

Difference-in-differences

−1.64 percentage points

95% CI −3.10 to −0.17

SSB tax citiesvs Control cities
difference-in-differences −1.64 percentage points (95% CI −3.10 to −0.17)

As reported in the abstract

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Overweight or obesity and obesity, overall

No significant overall difference in % of youth with overweight or obesity or with obesity vs control cities

BMI percentile by age group (difference-in-differences (DID))

Age 2-5 years in 2017, DID
−2.06 percentage points (95% CI, −4.04 to −0.09)
Age 6-11 years in 2017, DID
−2.79 percentage points (95% CI, −4.29 to −1.30)
  • Exposure vs control cities

% with overweight or obesity by age group (DID)

Age 2-5 years, DID
−5.46 percentage points (95% CI, −8.47 to −2.44)
Age 6-11 years, DID
−4.23 percentage points (95% CI, −6.90 to −1.57)
  • Exposure vs control cities

% with obesity by age group (DID)

Age 2-5 years, DID
−1.87 percentage points (95% CI, −3.36 to −0.38)
Age 6-11 years, DID
−1.85 percentage points (95% CI, −3.46 to −0.24)
  • Exposure vs control cities

Mean BMI percentile change by sex and race

Male youth
−1.98 percentage points (95% CI, −3.48 to −0.48)
Asian youth
−1.63 percentage points (95% CI, −3.10 to −0.16)
White youth
−2.58 percentage points (95% CI, −4.11 to −1.10)
  • vs control cities

White youth: % with overweight or obesity and % with obesity

% with overweight or obesity
−3.73 percentage points (95% CI, −6.11 to −1.35)
% with obesity
−2.78 percentage points (95% CI, −4.18 to −1.37)
  • Exposure vs control cities

Original publication

City-Level Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Youth Body Mass Index Percentile. JAMA Netw Open. Published 1 July 2024. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24822

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.