Type 1 diabetes

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) ‐derived average glucose is more strongly associated with microvascular complications than HbA1c in type 1 diabetes

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

CGM-derived average glucose appears superior to HbA1c as a marker of prevalent microvascular complications. These data challenge the high-glycator hypothesis and also suggest glucose variability may be an independent risk marker for microvascular disease.

Study context

Population
Adults with T1D9,023 paired measurements
Participants
2,721 adults
Exposure
HbA1c vs CGM-derived average glucose as markers of microvascular complications
Outcome
Associations of HbA1c and CGM-derived average glucose with prevalent retinopathy (any and proliferative) and microalbuminuria
Methodological detailsobservational, paired CGM (14 days) and HbA1c measurements
  • Observational
  • Paired CGM (14 days) and HbA1c measurements

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Prevalent retinopathy
HbA1c independently associated with retinopathy risk
p < 0.001
Average glucose independently associated with retinopathy risk
p < 0.001
CV glucose independently associated with retinopathy risk
p < 0.001
Socioeconomic deprivation independently associated with retinopathy risk
p = 0.003
Higher glycation associated with lower likelihood of prevalent retinopathy
p < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Age >45 vs Younger

HbA1c by age (despite lower or similar average glucose) · HbA1c higher than expected in older individuals

P = 0.004

Women vs Men

HbA1c by sex (despite lower or similar average glucose) · HbA1c higher than expected in women

P < 0.001

Stability of HbA1c-average glucose discordance category · over time

Fewer than one-third remain in the same discordance category over time

Original publication

CGM ‐derived average glucose is more strongly associated with microvascular complications than HbA1c in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 9 December 2025. doi:10.1111/dom.70365

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.