Pituitary & hypothalamus

Cell Lineage-Specific Differences in Clinical Behavior of Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenomas

J Clin Endocrinol MetabPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Authors' conclusion

The use of cell lineage-specific TFs by IHC enables to detect histopathological subtypes of NFPAs with distinct clinical behavior.

Study context

Population
Patients with NFPAs positive for one cell lineage-specific TF or negative for all 3, by immunohistochemistry (IHC); cohort studies, Medline, Embase, CENTRAL to July 11, 202327 studies
Comparison
NFPA subtypes by cell lineage-specific TF IHC: Null cell adenomas (NCAs), TPIT+, PIT1+ vs SF1+
Outcome
Cavernous sinus invasion
Methodological detailsrandom-effects inverse variance models, Mantel-Haenszel prevalence rate ratios, Quality In Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) risk of bias, Two authors independently extracted data and appraised risk of bias (QUIPS)
  • Random-effects inverse variance models
  • Mantel-Haenszel prevalence rate ratios
  • QUIPS risk of bias
  • Two authors independently extracted data and appraised risk of bias (QUIPS)

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

PRR

1.60

95% CI 1.22–2.08P = 0.0036

NCAs vs SF1+ · I2 10%, 95% PrI 1.23-2.06

PRR

1.43

95% CI 1.21–1.70P = 0.0017

TPIT+ vs SF1+ · I2 0%, 95% PrI 1.17-1.76

PRR

1.44

95% CI 1.01–2.06P = 0.0454

NCAs vs PIT1+ · I2 0%, 95% PrI 0.83-2.50

Further pooled results

Limited number of studies precluded data syntheses of recurrence and radiotherapy

Original publication

Cell Lineage-Specific Differences in Clinical Behavior of Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Published 21 February 2025. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf112

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.