Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

Antifracture Efficacy of 5- or 10-Yearly Zoledronate in Women Aged 50 to 60 Years: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Trial

J Clin Endocrinol MetabPublished Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

Fracture reductions with single-dose or 5-yearly zol appear greater during years 5 to 10 than years 0 to 5. The risk reductions are broadly consistent across this cohort and independent of baseline or change in BMD. This suggests that routine BMD monitoring may not be necessary for low-risk women considering the option of less frequent zol for long-term fracture risk reduction.

Study context

Population
Postmenopausal women aged 50 to 60 years with bone mineral density (BMD) T-score at lumbar spine, femoral neck or total hip between 0 and −2.5; 2012 to 2023
Participants
1,054 women
Comparison
5-yearly zol or single-dose zol vs placebo
Primary endpoint
Morphometric vertebral fractures, major osteoporotic and any fractures; effects over time and across baseline variables
Follow-up
10 years
Methodological details10-year, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single clinical research center
  • 10-year
  • Prospective
  • Double-blind
  • Placebo-controlled
  • Single clinical research center

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Morphometric vertebral fractures · years 5 to 10

Risk reduction

58%

95% CI 21%–77%

zol-zol

Risk reduction

57%

95% CI 21%–77%

zol-placebo

Original publication

Antifracture Efficacy of 5- or 10-Yearly Zoledronate in Women Aged 50 to 60 Years: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Published 18 October 2025. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf569

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.