Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

The muscle–bone unit in children and adolescents: insights from the Canadian Health Measures Survey

J Bone Miner ResPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

In conclusion, we found that the effect of muscle size on bone mass was in part mediated by muscle power. Subcutaneous fat, muscle density, weight, and BMI were determinants of the muscle-bone relationship.

Study context

Population
Canadian children and adolescents aged 6 to 19.9 years, Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS)
Participants
3,225 children
Outcome
Association between calf muscle CSA z-score (66% site, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT)) and tibia shaft BMC z-score (38% site), with Pmax z-score as mediator
Methodological detailsnational, population-based, path analysis
  • National
  • Population-based
  • Path analysis

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Association of muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) z-score with tibia bone mineral content (BMC) z-score, β
0.64 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.67)
Calf subcutaneous fat CSA z-score as determinant, β
−0.04 (95% CI −0.07 to −0.01)
Muscle density z-score as determinant, β
0.08 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.13)
Weight z-score as determinant, β
0.10 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.15)
Body mass index (BMI) z-score as determinant, β
0.14 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.21)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

The muscle–bone unit in children and adolescents: insights from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. J Bone Miner Res. Published 25 September 2026. doi:10.1093/jbmr/zjag143

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.