The estimated time fraction within range may mask prognostically distinct glycaemic profiles in critical illness: a three-database landmark study

Diabetes Res Clin PractPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

The estimated time fraction within range alone may not fully describe mortality associations.

Study context

Population
Adults alive in the ICU at 48 h with adequate glucose measurement coverage
Participants
10,732 / 17,444 / 4,699
Exposure
Compositional contrast: 5 percentage point lower time fraction above 180 mg/dL and higher fraction below 70 mg/dL, at constant fraction within range
  • MIMIC-IVn = 10,732
  • eICUn = 17,444
  • AmsterdamUMCdbn = 4,699
Outcome
Post-landmark ICU mortality
Methodological details48-h landmark study, three databases (MIMIC-IV, eICU, AmsterdamUMCdb), Time fractions estimated by linear interpolation of intermittent measurements
  • 48-h landmark study
  • Three databases (MIMIC-IV, eICU, AmsterdamUMCdb)
  • Time fractions estimated by linear interpolation of intermittent measurements

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Post-landmark ICU mortality for the compositional contrast: 5 percentage point lower time fraction >180 mg/dL and corresponding higher fraction <70 mg/dL, fraction within range held constant · after 48-h landmark
  • The composition contrast was associated with higher mortality
  • Cohort values given in the order MIMIC-IV, eICU, AmsterdamUMCdb (as listed in Methods)
  • Per_group events are deaths in each cohort

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Timing of association

Associations strongest in days 0-2 and stronger for recent than remote exposure

Distributional analyses

Association localized near and below 54 mg/dL

Parts of this Brief are withheld: the automatic checks could not confirm them against the abstract.

Original publication

The estimated time fraction within range may mask prognostically distinct glycaemic profiles in critical illness: a three-database landmark study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Published 23 September 2026. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113579

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.