Screening for the loss of protective sensation in people without a history of diabetic foot ulceration: Validation of two simple tests in India

Diabetes Res Clin PractPublished Diagnostic accuracy study

Authors' conclusion

Our results support the use of the IpTT as a screening tool for LOPS, but not of VibratipTM.

Study context

Population
Outpatient diabetic population without a history of ulceration, India
Comparison
Ipswich touch test and Vibratip vs neurothesiometer
Outcome
Detection of loss of protective sensation (LOPS)

Performance

As reported in the abstract

Detection of LOPS vs neurothesiometer
  • Results support Ipswich touch test (IpTT) as a screening tool for loss of protective sensation (LOPS), but not VibratipTM

Original publication

Screening for the loss of protective sensation in people without a history of diabetic foot ulceration: Validation of two simple tests in India. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Published 28 June 2023. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110810

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.