Obesity

Racial and ethnic disparities in clinical trials for pediatric obesity

Obesity (Silver Spring)Published Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

With the exception of Black and Hispanic children, historically marginalized racial groups were underrepresented in pediatric obesity trials, signifying a need to improve diversity of participants in these trials. Additionally, there are substantial gaps in the documentation of race and ethnicity information. Concerted efforts are needed to ensure adequate reporting of race and ethnicity information in clinical trials.

Study context

Population
Pediatric obesity clinical trials (participants aged ≤18 years) registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, completed January 2013–August 2023, conducted in the United States
Participants
260 trials
Outcome
Enrollment-prevalence disparity (EPD) for each racial and ethnic group

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

EPD by racial and ethnic group
GroupValuep
Asian−3.7% (IQR −3.7%–1.8%)p < 0.0001
American Indian and Alaska Native−2.1% (IQR −2.1%–-2.1%)p < 0.0001
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander−0.6% (IQR −0.6%–-0.6%)p < 0.0001

Value

Asian−3.7% (IQR −3.7%–1.8%)
American Indian and Alaska Native−2.1% (IQR −2.1%–-2.1%)
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander−0.6% (IQR −0.6%–-0.6%)

p

Asianp < 0.0001
American Indian and Alaska Nativep < 0.0001
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanderp < 0.0001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Trials reporting race and/or ethnicity data
128 trials (49.2%)

Original publication

Racial and ethnic disparities in clinical trials for pediatric obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). Published 4 February 2025. doi:10.1002/oby.24228

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.