Long‐term follow‐up of the impact of brief sleep and lifestyle interventions in infancy on BMIz‐score at 11 years of age: The POI randomized controlled trial
Authors' conclusion
Sustained reductions in BMI and obesity risk from an early sleep intervention were not apparent 9 years later, whereas a more traditional lifestyle intervention resulted in increased rates of obesity, not explained by any differences in lifestyle behaviours measured.
Study context
- Population
- Children from the original POI RCT assessed around their 11th birthday; 48% female, mean age 11.1 years63% of original sample · original POI RCT 802
- Participants
- 512 children
- Comparison
- Sleep intervention vs no sleep intervention; FAB intervention vs no FAB
- Primary endpoint
- BMI z-score
- Follow-up
- 11 years
Methodological details2 × 2 factorial, multiple imputation
- 2 × 2 factorial
- Multiple imputation
Primary result
As reported in the abstract
Mean difference (95% CI)
Sleepvs No sleepno longer significant
−0.16(−0.41 to 0.08)
- FAB vs No FAB · greater body mass index (BMI) z-scores with FAB
- 0.24 (95% CI 0.01–0.47)
Further findings
| Outcome | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Risk of overweight (including obesity), sleep intervention · 11 yearsSleepvs No sleepNo longer significant | 0.85 (0.56–1.29) | |
| 0.512Odds ratio (log scale) |
| Outcome | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Risk of obesity, FAB intervention · 11 yearsFAB vs No FAB · higher risk with FAB | 1.56 (CI 1.03–2.36) |
Lifestyle variables and wellbeing · 11 years
- No significant differences in any lifestyle variables nor wellbeing measures across all groups
Original publication
Long‐term follow‐up of the impact of brief sleep and lifestyle interventions in infancy on BMIz‐score at 11 years of age: The POI randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Obes. Published 17 January 2025. doi:10. 1111/ ijpo. 13204
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →