Type 2 & other diabetes

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of Biocon's biosimilar insulin N with US ‐licensed Humulin® N formulation in healthy subjects: Results from the RHINE ‐2 (Recombinant Human INsulin Equivalence‐2) study

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

PK and PD equivalence was shown between Biocon's Insulin-N and Humulin-N in healthy subjects, and both treatments were well tolerated and considered safe.

Study context

Population
Healthy subjects85 completed
Participants
90 subjects
Comparison
Biocon's Insulin-N vs Humulin® N (Humulin-N)
Primary endpoint
Pharmacokinetic (PK): AUCins.0-24h and Cins.max; PD: AUCGIR.0-24h and GIRmax
Follow-up
0 to 24 h
Methodological detailsphase 1, single-centre, double-blind, three-period, six-sequence, partially replicated crossover, 24-h euglycaemic clamp
  • Phase 1
  • Single-centre
  • Double-blind
  • Three-period, six-sequence, partially replicated crossover
  • 24-h euglycaemic clamp

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

Geometric least squares mean ratio, AUCGIR.0-24h

104.61%

Biocon's Insulin-N

Geometric least squares mean ratio, GIRmax

100.81%

Biocon's Insulin-N

Intra-subject variability (pharmacodynamic (PD))
≥0.294

Safety

Serious adverse events
0
Safety profile of Biocon's Insulin-N similar to Humulin-N

Original publication

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of Biocon's biosimilar insulin N with US ‐licensed Humulin® N formulation in healthy subjects: Results from the RHINE ‐2 (Recombinant Human INsulin Equivalence‐2) study. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 14 February 2023. doi:10.1111/dom.14994

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.