Diabetes complications

Patient and practitioner perceptions around use of artificial intelligence within the English NHS diabetic eye screening programme

Diabetes Res Clin PractPublished Qualitative survey study

Authors' conclusion

Limited understanding of AI was a barrier to acceptance. Educating diverse PLD groups and HCP about AI's accuracy and reliability is crucial to building trust and facilitating its integration into screening practices.

Study context

Population
People living with diabetes and healthcare practitioners in the English NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programme; surveys distributed via Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (DESP) centres, charities and the British Association of Retinal Screenersfree-text commenters
Participants
387 vs 98
Exposure
PLD vs Healthcare Practitioners (HCP)
  • PLDn = 387
  • HCPn = 98
Outcome
Perceptions towards the introduction of AI in DESP
Methodological detailsonline surveys, co-developed with PLD and HCP, free-text responses analysed with coding framework, Surveys validated through interviews across three centres
  • Online surveys
  • Co-developed with PLD and HCP
  • Free-text responses analysed with coding framework
  • Surveys validated through interviews across three centres

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Perceptions of AI in DESP (free-text themes)

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Patient and practitioner perceptions around use of artificial intelligence within the English NHS diabetic eye screening programme. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. Published 19 December 2024. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111964

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.