Diabetes technology

In-Hospital Diabetes Management by a Diabetes Team and Insulin Titration Algorithms Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring or Point-of-Care Glucose Testing in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (DIATEC): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Diabetes CarePublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

In-hospital CGM increased TIR by 15 percentage points, mainly by reducing TAR. CGM also lowered TBR, glycemic variability, prolonged hypoglycemic events, insulin usage, and in-hospital complications.

Study context

Population
Non-ICU hospitalized patients with T2D, 2 centres
Participants
166 participants
Comparison
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-guided vs POC glucose testing-guided insulin titration by diabetes teams
Primary endpoint
Difference in time in range (TIR) (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) between arms
Follow-up
During hospitalization
Methodological detailstwo-center
  • Two-center

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/L)

P < 0.001

Further findings

TAR >10.0 mmol/L · lower with CGM

P = 0.001

CV · lower with CGM

P = 0.024

OutcomeRelative difference (95% CI)P value
TBR <3.9 mmol/L0.57 (0.34–0.97)P = 0.042
OutcomeIRR (95% CI)P value
Prolonged hypoglycemic events0.13 (0.04–0.46)P = 0.001

Total insulin dose · lower with CGM

P = 0.049

Safety

OutcomeIRR (95% CI)P value
Composite of complications0.76 (0.59–0.98)P = 0.032

Original publication

In-Hospital Diabetes Management by a Diabetes Team and Insulin Titration Algorithms Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring or Point-of-Care Glucose Testing in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (DIATEC): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. Published 31 January 2025. doi:10.2337/dc24-2222

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.