Pituitary & hypothalamus

Growth Hormone Assay-Adjusted Standardization Reveals Distinct Clinical Phenotypes in Acromegaly

Endocr PractPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

GH standardization to assay-specific ULN reveals clinically meaningful phenotypes in acromegaly that correlate with age, tumor characteristics, and disease severity (particularly arthropathy). GHxULN complements IGF-1 by capturing tumor secretory activity, and this stratification approach may support more individualized clinical decision-making.

Study context

Population
Patients diagnosed with acromegaly from 2010 onward, multicenter
Participants
416 patients
Exposure
Growth hormone (GH) categories standardized to assay-specific ULN
Outcome
Clinical phenotypes by GH standardization and cluster analysis
Methodological detailsmulticenter, unsupervised machine learning cluster analysis
  • Multicenter
  • Unsupervised machine learning cluster analysis

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

GH within normal reference range for assay (GH-B <1.0×ULN)
36%
Gradient across GH-4 categories: age
z = −5.34, P < .001
Gradient across GH-4 categories: tumor size
z = 8.01, P < .001
Gradient across GH-4 categories: IGF-1
z = 9.00, P < .001
Gradient across GH-4 categories: symptom duration
z = 4.34, P < .001
Cluster 1 (older age, lower GH/IGF-1, intermediate tumor size)
49.0%
Cluster 2 (intermediate age, moderate biochemical activity, smaller tumors)
44.4%
Cluster 3 (younger age, markedly elevated GH/IGF-1, large aggressive tumors)
6.6%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeORP value
ArthropathyGH 1.0-9.9×ULN vs GH <0.25×ULN · reference category not stated3.5P = 0.015
ArthropathyGH ≥10×ULN vs GH <0.25×ULN · reference category not stated6.58P = 0.002

Microadenomas

Microadenomas; more frequent in older patients, associated with lower GH/IGF-1
23.1%

Original publication

Growth Hormone Assay-Adjusted Standardization Reveals Distinct Clinical Phenotypes in Acromegaly. Endocr Pract. Published 14 October 2025. doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2025.10.006

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.