Type 2 & other diabetes

Glycaemic control, body weight, and safety of tirzepatide versus dulaglutide by baseline glycated haemoglobin level in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the SURPASS J‐mono study

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Secondary analysis of the SURPASS J-mono randomised trial

Authors' conclusion

Regardless of baseline HbA1c (≤8.5% or >8.5%), tirzepatide at doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg is effective in Japanese patients with T2D compared with dulaglutide 0.75 mg in terms of glycaemic control and body weight reduction, with an adequate safety profile consistent with previous reports.

Study context

Population
Japanese patients with T2D, baseline HbA1c range ≥7.0% to ≤10.0%; subgroups baseline HbA1c ≤8.5% (≤69 mmol/mol) and >8.5% (>69 mmol/mol)randomized · >8.5% (>69 mmol/mol) 203
Participants
636 patients
Comparison
Tirzepatide vs dulaglutide 0.75 mg, by baseline HbA1c ≤8.5% vs >8.5%
Primary endpoint
Mean change in HbA1c and body weight, and incidence of AEs, by baseline HbA1c subgroup
Follow-up
52 weeks
Methodological detailsexploratory subgroup analysis, 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, phase 3, Conducted in Japan
  • Exploratory subgroup analysis
  • 52-week
  • Multicentre
  • Double-blind
  • Parallel
  • Active-controlled
  • Phase 3
  • Conducted in Japan

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

HbA1c change by baseline HbA1c subgroup
HbA1c change (LSM), baseline HbA1c >8.5%, tirzepatide
−3.13% to −3.86%
HbA1c change (LSM), baseline HbA1c >8.5%, dulaglutide
−1.81%
HbA1c change (LSM), baseline HbA1c ≤8.5%, tirzepatide
−2.00% to −2.32%
HbA1c change (LSM), baseline HbA1c ≤8.5%, dulaglutide
−1.05%
Treatment-by-baseline HbA1c subgroup interaction
P ≤ 0.001
Body weight LSM change, tirzepatide arms, baseline HbA1c ≤8.5%
−6.7 to −10.7 kg
Body weight LSM change, tirzepatide arms, baseline HbA1c >8.5%
−4.0 to −10.6 kg
Body weight LSM change, dulaglutide, baseline HbA1c ≤8.5%
−0.6 kg
Body weight LSM change, dulaglutide, baseline HbA1c >8.5%
−0.4 kg

Safety

Incidence of hypoglycaemia was low; no substantial difference in hypoglycaemia or treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) between subgroups

Original publication

Glycaemic control, body weight, and safety of tirzepatide versus dulaglutide by baseline glycated haemoglobin level in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the SURPASS J‐mono study. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 4 October 2023. doi:10.1111/dom.15296

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.