Financial Incentives, Income Supplementation, Cash Transfer, and Universal Basic Income Interventions in Diabetes: Understanding Differences and Effectiveness: A Scoping Review
Authors' conclusion
Overall, evidence supports the relationship between monetary approaches, diabetes-related outcomes, and self-care behaviors across monetary approaches.
Study context
- Population
- Studies of monetary interventions (positive monetary reinforcers and gains) in diabetes; OVID Medline, PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL to July 2024
- Participants
- 13 articles
- Comparison
- Monetary interventions in diabetes
- Financial incentivesn = 8
- Income supplementationn = 3
- Cash transfersn = 1
- Income supplementation + financial incentivesn = 1
- Outcome
- HbA1c
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
Financial incentives
0.19% to 1.74%
Income supplementation
0.7% to 1.3%
Cash transfers
0.2% to 0.7%
- Studies with statistically significant and clinically meaningful changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
- 10 of 13
Original publication
Financial Incentives, Income Supplementation, Cash Transfer, and Universal Basic Income Interventions in Diabetes: Understanding Differences and Effectiveness: A Scoping Review. Diabetes Care. Published 14 January 2025. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →