Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Heterogeneity Parameters Combined with Inflammatory Cells to Predict the Value of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients Post Myocardial Infarction

Cardiovasc DiabetolPublished Retrospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

In patients with chronic MI, normal LVEF, and no prior PCI, the occurrence of HFpEF is not correlated with infarct volume; however, BMI, diabetes, monocyte, LV EAT, and EAT entropy are independent risk factors for HFpEF with significant predictive value, with the highest predictive efficacy observed monocyte and when combining EAT entropy and LV EAT. Additionally, both overall and local EAT volumes exhibit a moderate positive correlation with leukocytes,monocytes and inflammatory markers, and were also positively correlated with diastolic dysfunction. This suggests that, in clinical practice, beyond traditional indicators, there should be an increased focus on EAT heterogeneity and perivascular EAT in MI patients with normal LVEF who have not undergone PCI to to reduce the incidence of HFpEF.

Study context

Population
Myocardial infarction (MI) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who did not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, January 2015–July 2023
Participants
203 patients
Exposure
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs non-HFpEF after MI with preserved LVEF
  • HFpEFn = 74
  • non-HFpEFn = 129reference
Outcome
Incidence of HFpEF
Follow-up
Median 34 months
Methodological detailssingle-centre
  • Single-centre

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Predictors of HFpEF
Time-dependent ROC maximum AUC, BMI
0.67
Time-dependent ROC AUC, LV epicardial adipose tissue (EAT)
0.63
Time-dependent ROC AUC, EAT entropy
0.60
Time-dependent ROC maximum AUC, monocyte
0.70
Time-dependent ROC maximum AUC, LV EAT + EAT entropy combined
0.70

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeP value
Baseline differences HFpEF vs non-HFpEFP < 0.05
  • Baseline differences HFpEF vs non-HFpEF: BMI, diabetes, renal failure, leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, total EAT, EAT entropy, LV EAT, left atrial end-systolic volume (LAESV), TG, NHR, MHR, LACI differed

Baseline differences HFpEF vs non-HFpEF

No significant differences in age, sex and infarct volume

Correlations of EAT volume

Overall and local EAT volumes positively correlated with leukocytes, monocytes, MHR and SIRI
EAT volume positively correlated with LACI (diastolic dysfunction marker)

Original publication

Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Heterogeneity Parameters Combined with Inflammatory Cells to Predict the Value of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients Post Myocardial Infarction. Cardiovasc Diabetol. Published 3 May 2025. doi:10.1186/s12933-025-02720-w

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.