Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic medications in the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis on behalf of the ECTS clinical action group

Eur J EndocrinolPublished Systematic review and network meta-analysis

Authors' conclusion

This network-meta-analysis demonstrates a clear gradient of efficacy among AOM in GIOP, with anabolic and potent antiresorptive-medications producing the largest gains in lumbar-spine aBMD

Study context

Population
Adults receiving oral glucocorticoids (glucocorticoid-induced-osteoporosis (GIOP) prevention and treatment); age range 29.6–70.6 years, 72.5% females31 studies (28 RCTs, 3 observational)
Participants
5,260 adults
Comparison
Anti-osteoporotic medications (anti-osteoporotic-medications (AOM)) compared with each other and with placebo or calcium/vitamin D
Outcome
Percentage change in lumbar-spine aBMD
Methodological detailsPRISMA-NMA, random effects, direct and indirect comparisons, CINeMA certainty assessment
  • PRISMA-NMA
  • Random effects
  • Direct and indirect comparisons
  • CINeMA certainty assessment

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Lumbar-spine aBMD % change

Effect-size

Teriparatide vs Alendronate
3.8 (95% CI 2.9–4.6)
Teriparatide vs Risedronate
4.0 (95% CI 2.9–5.1)
Teriparatide vs Denosumab
1.5 (95% CI 0.1–2.9)
Teriparatide vs Zoledronate
2.4 (95% CI 1.1–3.6)
Teriparatide vs Romosozumab · no significant difference
0.3 (95% CI −2.1 to 1.4)

Further pooled results

Sensitivity analysis: established GIOP (glucocorticoids (GC) users ≥3months)

Teriparatide and romosozumab remained superior to antiresorptive medications

Total-hip and femoral-neck areal bone- mineral-density (aBMD)

Evidence limited by substantial network inconsistency (mostly missing data)

Fractures

Included studies were underpowered to assess differences in fracture outcomes

Original publication

Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic medications in the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis on behalf of the ECTS clinical action group. Eur J Endocrinol. Published 7 August 2026. doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvag147

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.