Diabetes technology

Discordance Between Glucose Management Indicator and Glycated Hemoglobin in People Without Diabetes

Diabetes Technol TherPublished Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

GMI does not accurately estimate HbA1c in healthy people without diabetes.

Study context

Population
Children and nonpregnant adults (age ≥6 years) without diabetes (laboratory HbA1c <5.7%, negative islet antibodies); mean age 31.2 ± 21.0 years, 66.0% female, HbA1c 5.1% ± 0.3%153 analysed
Participants
201 children
Exposure
Glucose management indicator (GMI) vs laboratory HbA1c
Outcome
Discordance between GMI (from mean sensor glucose, blinded Dexcom G6 up to 10 days) and HbA1c
Methodological detailsmulticentre, blinded continuous glucose monitor (CGM)
  • Multicentre
  • Blinded CGM

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Discordance between GMI and HbA1c

Mean GMI higher than laboratory HbA1c

0.59%

Discordance between GMI and HbA1c ≥0.4%, people without diabetes

71%

Discordance between GMI and HbA1c ≥0.4%, original GMI development cohort

39%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Original publication

Discordance Between Glucose Management Indicator and Glycated Hemoglobin in People Without Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. Published 15 February 2023. doi:10.1089/dia.2022.0544

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.