Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

Bisphosphonate treatment for secondary osteoporosis in children, youth, and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Osteoporos IntPublished Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Pooled result · Lumbar spine BMD z-scoreResult — go to the resultMD 0.67 95% CI 0.37–0.97

Authors' conclusion

BP treatment benefits pediatric secondary osteoporosis by improving lumbar spine BMD and BMC.

Study context

Population
Children, youth and young adults aged ≤ 21 years with secondary osteoporosis17 studies (15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 2 quasi-RCTs)
Comparison
Bisphosphonates vs control
Outcome
Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) z-score
Methodological detailsPRISMA, GRADE
  • PRISMA
  • GRADE

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

MD

0.67

95% CI 0.37–0.97

BPvs Control
MD 0.67 (95% CI 0.37–0.97)

Further pooled results

OutcomeMD (g) (95% CI)
Lumbar spine bone mineral content (BMC)2.90 (0.91–4.90)

Vertebral and non-vertebral fractures

No studies adequately powered to assess vertebral and non-vertebral fractures

Patient-reported outcomes

No consistent results

Safety

OutcomeRR (95% CI)
AEs1.08 (0.94–1.23)

Adverse events (AEs)

AEs comparable between treatment and control groups

AEs, short-term periods after the first infusion

AEs more likely in the treatment group: RR
2.24 (1.22, 4.11) (95% CI)

Original publication

Bisphosphonate treatment for secondary osteoporosis in children, youth, and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. Published 27 January 2026. doi:10.1007/s00198-025-07837-y

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.