Type 2 & other diabetes

Accuracy, Variability, and Bias of Glycemic Biomarkers in Patients Treated With Maintenance Dialysis

Diabetes CarePublished Prospective cohort study

Authors' conclusion

HbA1c and GA were strongly correlated with mean CGM blood glucose, but all biomarkers had substantial bias by relevant clinical characteristics. HbA1c and GA may be useful assessments of average glycemia in patients treated with maintenance dialysis, if bias can be adequately addressed.

Study context

Population
People with and without diabetes treated with maintenance dialysis; 43% women, 63% with diabetes
Participants
251 people
Exposure
HbA1c, glycated albumin (GA) and fructosamine vs continuous glucose monitor (CGM)-derived mean glycemia
Outcome
Correlation with mean CGM glucose (overall)
Methodological detailscommunity-based
  • Community-based

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

GroupR
HbA1c0.85
GA0.87
Fructosamine0.70

R

HbA1c0.85
GA0.87
Fructosamine0.70

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHbA1cGAFructosamine
Correlation with mean CGM glucose in diabetes
R0.840.840.64
Biomarker levelsmean 6.2 (SD 1.4%) %mean 19.6 (SD 6.3%) %mean 351 (SD 99) µmol/L
  • Biomarker levels: CGM mean 170 (SD 63) mg/dL

Bias vs mean CGM glucose

HbA1c significantly biased by erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose, BMI, hemoglobin and serum albumin
GA and fructosamine biased by dialysis modality and vintage, residual kidney function and BMI

Valid CGM days

Median valid days of CGM data
9.3 (IQR 8.5-9.4)

Original publication

Accuracy, Variability, and Bias of Glycemic Biomarkers in Patients Treated With Maintenance Dialysis. Diabetes Care. Published 10 March 2026. doi:10.2337/dc25-2952

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.