Obesity

A systematic review of the economic value proposition for commercially available nonsurgical weight‐loss interventions

Obesity (Silver Spring)Published Systematic review of economic evaluations

Authors' conclusion

Evidence of cost-effectiveness for commercially available, evidence-based, nonsurgical weight-loss interventions is mixed. There is no evidence for cost-saving weight-loss medications and only weak evidence for behavioral and weight-loss interventions. Results provide a call to action to generate more robust evidence of the economic value proposition for these interventions.

Study context

Population
Economic evaluations of commercially available weight-loss products and services shown to result in clinically significant weight loss20 studies · 32 comparisons
Comparison
Commercially available nonsurgical weight-loss interventions
Outcome
Evidence of cost-effectiveness or cost savings

Pooled result

As reported in the abstract

Comparisons showing evidence of cost-effectiveness

Pharmaceutical

10 of 20 comparisons

10 events

Nonpharmaceutical

4 of 12 comparisons

4 events

Nonpharmaceutical comparisons claiming cost savings
5

Original publication

A systematic review of the economic value proposition for commercially available nonsurgical weight‐loss interventions. Obesity (Silver Spring). Published 25 May 2023. doi:10.1002/oby.23760

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.