Type 2 & other diabetes

Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in individuals with basal-bolus insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 4): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial

LancetPublished Randomised controlled trial

Primary result · Change in HbA1cResult — go to the resultEstimated treatment difference 0.02 percentage points 95% CI −0.11 to 0.15

Authors' conclusion

In people with long-standing type 2 diabetes on a basal-bolus regimen, once-weekly icodec showed similar improvements in glycaemic control, with fewer basal insulin injections, lower bolus insulin dose, and with no increase in hypoglycaemic rates compared with once-daily glargine U100. Key strengths of this trial include the use of masked continous glucose monitoring; the high trial completion rate; and the inclusion of a large, diverse, and multinational population. Limitations include the relatively short trial duration and the open-label design.

Study context

Population
Adults with long-standing T2D on a basal-bolus regimen (HbA1c 7.0–10.0%), 80 sites in nine countries; mean diabetes duration 17.1 years (SD 8.4)randomised 1:1
Participants
582 adults
Comparison
Once-weekly icodec vs once-daily glargine U100, both with bolus insulin aspart
  • Icodecn = 291
  • Glargine U100n = 291reference
Primary endpoint
Change in HbA1c from baseline (non-inferiority margin 0.3 percentage points)
Follow-up
Week 26
Methodological detailsphase 3a, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority, Between May 14 and Oct 29, 2021; 746 screened
  • Phase 3a
  • Open-label
  • Multicentre
  • Treat-to-target
  • Non-inferiority
  • Between May 14 and Oct 29, 2021; 746 screened

Primary result

Change in HbA1c

Estimated treatment difference

0.02 percentage points

95% CI −0.11 to 0.15

P < 0.0001

Change by group

Icodec

−1.16

estimated mean change · percentage points

Glargine U100

−1.18

estimated mean change · percentage points

Icodecvs Glargine U100
estimated treatment difference 0.02 percentage points (95% CI −0.11 to 0.15); P < 0.0001

As reported in the abstract

Safety

Adverse events · safety analysis set

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events reported Icodec 35 · Glargine U100 33

Combined level 2 and level 3 hypoglycaemia

Rates similar between treatment groups
No new safety concerns identified for icodec

Original publication

Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in individuals with basal-bolus insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 4): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. Published 5 May 2023. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00520-2

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.