Type 2 & other diabetes

Risk of insulin initiation with sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A real‐world claims database study in Japan

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Retrospective cohort study

Main finding · Insulin initiationResult — go to the resultHazard ratio 0.46 95% CI 0.28–0.74

Authors' conclusion

The risk of insulin initiation was lower in patients with T2DM newly treated with an SGLT2i than in those newly treated with a DPP4i. SGLT2i may reduce or delay the need for insulin therapy.

Study context

Population
Japanese patients with T2D newly treated with an SGLT2i or a DPP4i, JMDC Claims Database, 1 January 2015–31 March 2023matched cohort
Participants
18,488 vs 18,488
Exposure
New SGLT2i vs new DPP4i
  • SGLT2in = 18,488
  • DPP4in = 18,488reference
Outcome
Insulin initiation
Methodological detailspropensity-score matched 1:1, claims database (JMDC)
  • Propensity-score matched 1:1
  • Claims database (JMDC)

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Hazard ratio

0.46

95% CI 0.28–0.74

P = 0.001

By group

SGLT2i

0.95 per 1000 person-years

DPP4i

2.12 per 1000 person-years

SGLT2ivs DPP4i
HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.28–0.74); P = 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeHR (95% CI)P value
Other antidiabetic drugs added onto baseline treatment0.66 (0.64–0.69)P < 0.001
Antihypertensive drugs added onto baseline treatment0.90 (0.85–0.95)P < 0.001

Original publication

Risk of insulin initiation with sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A real‐world claims database study in Japan. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 13 January 2025. doi:10.1111/dom.16188

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.