Retatrutide Once Weekly in Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis Pain and Obesity
Authors' conclusion
In participants with painful knee osteoarthritis and obesity, treatment with retatrutide resulted in significantly greater reductions in both the WOMAC pain score and body weight than placebo. (Funded by Eli Lilly; TRIUMPH-4 and -1 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT05931367 and NCT05929066.).
Study context
- Population
- Adults without diabetes who had painful knee osteoarthritis and a body-mass index of at least 27underwent randomization · TRIUMPH-4 445 · TRIUMPH-1-OA 574
- Comparison
- Once-weekly subcutaneous retatrutide vs placebo
- Outcome
- TRIUMPH-4: change in the WOMAC pain score (range, 0 to 10, higher scores indicating worse pain)
- Follow-up
- Week 68
Methodological detailsrandomized, placebo-controlled
- Randomized
- Placebo-controlled
Main finding
As reported in the abstract
RETATRUTIDE 9 MG
−3.96
mean change
RETATRUTIDE 12 MG
−3.74
mean change
PLACEBO
−2.12
mean change
Estimate (95% CI)P value
RETATRUTIDE 9 MGvs PLACEBO
difference (hybrid-treatment estimand) −1.83(−2.37 to −1.30)
RETATRUTIDE 12 MGvs PLACEBO
difference (hybrid-treatment estimand) −1.61(−2.16 to −1.07)
RETATRUTIDE 9 MGvs PLACEBO
difference (ITT estimand) −1.70(−2.19 to −1.22)
P < 0.001 for all comparisonsRETATRUTIDE 12 MGvs PLACEBO
difference (ITT estimand) −1.38(−1.91 to −0.85)
P < 0.001 for all comparisonsFurther findings
Mean percent change
| Outcome | RETATRUTIDE 4 MG | RETATRUTIDE 9 MG | RETATRUTIDE 12 MG | PLACEBO | Difference (percentage points) (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRIUMPH-4: percent change in body weight (primary end point) · week 68RETATRUTIDE 9 MGvs PLACEBOTreatment-policy strategy | — not stated in the abstract | −20.0% | −23.7% | −4.6% | −15.4 (−18.7 to −12.1) | P < 0.001 for both comparisons | |
| TRIUMPH-4: percent change in body weight (primary end point) · week 68RETATRUTIDE 12 MGvs PLACEBOTreatment-policy strategy | −19.2 (−22.4 to −15.9) | P < 0.001 for both comparisons | |||||
| −30−20−10010Difference, percentage points (linear scale) |
— not stated in the abstract
Mean change
| Outcome | RETATRUTIDE 4 MG | RETATRUTIDE 9 MG | RETATRUTIDE 12 MG | PLACEBO | Estimate | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRIUMPH-1-OA: change in the WOMAC pain score (primary end point) · week 80RETATRUTIDE 4 MGvs PLACEBO | −3.22 | −3.48 | −3.64 | −1.87 | difference (hybrid-treatment estimand) −1.35 (95% CI −1.92 to −0.78) | ||
| TRIUMPH-1-OA: change in the WOMAC pain score (primary end point) · week 80RETATRUTIDE 9 MGvs PLACEBO | difference (hybrid-treatment estimand) −1.61 (95% CI −2.20 to −1.02) | ||||||
| TRIUMPH-1-OA: change in the WOMAC pain score (primary end point) · week 80RETATRUTIDE 12 MGvs PLACEBO | difference (hybrid-treatment estimand) −1.77 (95% CI −2.34 to −1.20) | ||||||
| TRIUMPH-1-OA: change in the WOMAC pain score (primary end point) · week 80RETATRUTIDE 4 MGvs PLACEBO | difference (ITT estimand) −0.96 (95% CI −1.61 to −0.30) | P ≤ 0.005 for all comparisons | |||||
| TRIUMPH-1-OA: change in the WOMAC pain score (primary end point) · week 80RETATRUTIDE 9 MGvs PLACEBO | difference (ITT estimand) −1.41 (95% CI −2.07 to −0.75) | P ≤ 0.005 for all comparisons | |||||
| TRIUMPH-1-OA: change in the WOMAC pain score (primary end point) · week 80RETATRUTIDE 12 MGvs PLACEBO | difference (ITT estimand) −1.64 (95% CI −2.26 to −1.02) | P ≤ 0.005 for all comparisons | |||||
| −3−2−101Difference (linear scale) |
Safety
- In both trials, serious adverse events were more common with retatrutide than with placebo, and the most common adverse events were gastrointestinal
Original publication
Retatrutide Once Weekly in Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis Pain and Obesity. N Engl J Med. Published 8 November 2026. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →