Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures: observational and Mendelian randomisation studies

DiabetologiaPublished Observational cohort and Mendelian randomisation studies

Authors' conclusion

Hyperglycaemia and diabetes are risk factors for fragility fracture and one- and two-sample MR analyses supported a causal effect of hyperglycaemia on arm fractures. Diabetes and previous fragility fracture jointly conferred the highest risk of death in the general population.

Study context

Population
Individuals from the Copenhagen City Heart Study and Copenhagen General Population Study and UK Biobank; MAGIC summary data for two-sample Mendelian Randomisation (MR)117,054 Copenhagen · MAGIC summary data 196,743
Exposure
Diabetes vs no diabetes; genetically predicted hyperglycaemia
Outcome
Fragility fracture (hip, spine and arm [humerus/wrist]) from national health registries
Methodological detailsone-sample MR, two-sample MR
  • One-sample MR
  • Two-sample MR

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Any fragility fracture
Each group vs without diabetesHazard ratio (95% CI)
T1D
1.50(1.19–1.88)
T2D
1.22(1.13–1.32)
Higher fasting and non-fasting glucose and HbA1c associated with higher risk of any fragility fracture
P < 0.001

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

Arm fracture, MR

One-sample MR, high non-fasting glucose (Copenhagen + UK Biobank), RR
1.41 [1.11, 1.79], p=0.004
Two-sample MR, fasting glucose, OR
1.50 [1.03, 2.18], p=0.03
Two-sample MR, HbA1c, OR
2.79 [1.12, 6.93], p=0.03

Any fragility fracture, MR

One-sample MR, non-fasting glucose
1.18 (1.00, 1.41), p=0.06
Two-sample MR, fasting glucose
1.36 (0.89, 2.09), p=0.15
Two-sample MR, HbA1c
2.47 (0.95, 6.43), p=0.06

Cumulative death · age 80 years

Fragility fracture only
27%
Diabetes only
54%
Both conditions
67%
Neither
17%

Original publication

Hyperglycaemia, diabetes and risk of fragility fractures: observational and Mendelian randomisation studies. Diabetologia. Published 14 December 2023. doi:10.1007/s00125-023-06054-8

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.