Diabetes technology

Effect of introduction of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control in individuals living with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with non‐insulin therapies—A randomised controlled trial

Diabetes Obes MetabPublished Randomised controlled trial

Authors' conclusion

The use of isCGM in individuals living with T2DM on non-insulin therapy showed promise in improving glycaemic control, as evidenced by increased TIR, albeit without a significant reduction in HbA1c or impact on diabetes distress, suggesting this could be potentially beneficial in individuals with T2DM.

Study context

Population
Adults with T2D receiving non-insulin therapies; median age 59.5 years, 57.5% male
Participants
40 adults
Comparison
isCGM vs blinded CGM
Primary endpoint
Fall in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of ≥5.5 mmol/mol
Follow-up
12 weeks
Methodological detailspilot
  • Pilot

Primary result

As reported in the abstract

HbA1c reduction ≥5.5 mmol/mol

P = 0.34

Further findings

OutcomeEstimateP value
TIR · 12 weeksimprovement 18 percentage points (CI 2–35)P = 0.028
HbA1c · 12 weeksNon-significant; lower with Libre 2reduction 8 mmol/mol

Other CGM metrics and diabetes distress (diabetes distress scale (DDS2))

No significant differences between groups in other CGM metrics or diabetes distress

Original publication

Effect of introduction of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring on glycaemic control in individuals living with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with non‐insulin therapies—A randomised controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 11 December 2024. doi:10.1111/dom.16116

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.