Developing and exploring the validity of a patient reported experience measure for adult inpatient diabetes care
Authors' conclusion
This new PREM allows for experiences of inpatient diabetes care to be measured, understood and reported on to help identify priority areas for improving care quality.
Study context
- Population
- Adult inpatients receiving diabetes care
- Participants
- 228 pilot respondents
- Comparison
- Paper vs Online
- Papern = 198
- Onlinen = 30
- Outcome
- Performance of the PREM: uptake/number of responses and survey validity (adequate data quality and useful information)
Methodological detailsin-depth interviews, cognitive testing, pilot survey, Refined 38-item Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) piloted, 27 in-depth interviews informed a 42-item PREM, cognitively tested with 10 people
- In-depth interviews
- Cognitive testing
- Pilot survey
- Refined 38-item PREM piloted
- 27 in-depth interviews informed a 42-item PREM, cognitively tested with 10 people
Performance
As reported in the abstract
PREM performance
- Low drop-out or missing data rates, suggesting the PREM was appropriately constructed
- Item frequencies, variances and problem scores showed questions provided sufficient score differentiation
Original publication
Developing and exploring the validity of a patient reported experience measure for adult inpatient diabetes care. Diabet Med. Published 27 December 2023. doi:10.
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →