Comparative efficacy and safety of Glucagon‐like pepetide‐1 receptor agonists with metformin in Asian versus non‐Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Pooled result · HbA1cResult — go to the resultWMD −1.09 95% CI −1.48 to −0.71Authors' conclusion
This meta-analysis suggested potential ethnic variations in the treatment combining GLP-1RAs with metformin, with Asian populations achieving superior HbA1c reduction and weight loss alongside better GI tolerance.
Study context
- Population
- Patients with T2D in RCTs comparing GLP-1 RA/metformin combination vs metformin alone11 papers
- Participants
- 750 vs 1,096
- Comparison
- GLP-1 RA + metformin vs metformin alone, Asian vs non-Asian
- Asiann = 750
- Non-Asiann = 1,096reference
- Outcome
- HbA1c
Methodological detailssubgroup analyses for Asian vs non-Asian cohorts
- Subgroup analyses for Asian vs non-Asian cohorts
Pooled result
As reported in the abstract
WMD
−1.09
95% CI −1.48 to −0.71
P < 0.05
Asianvs Non-Asian
WMD −1.09 (95% CI −1.48 to −0.71); P < 0.05
Further pooled results
| Outcome | WMD (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | −4.16 (−6.11 to −2.22) | P < 0.05 | |
| −10−505Difference (linear scale) |
| Outcome | P value |
|---|---|
| Fasting glucoseNo racial variation | P = 0.78 |
- Weight: greater improvement in Asian group; subgroup heterogeneity I2 = 89.5%
Safety
| Outcome | RR (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GI events | 0.76 (0.47–1.22) | P < 0.00001 | |
| 0.512Relative risk (log scale) |
| Outcome | P value |
|---|---|
| HypoglycaemiaNo racial variation | P = 0.16 |
- Gastrointestinal (GI) events: lower GI events risk in Asian group; subgroup heterogeneity I2 = 93.7%
Original publication
Comparative efficacy and safety of Glucagon‐like pepetide‐1 receptor agonists with metformin in Asian versus non‐Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. Published 11 September 2025. doi:10. 1111/ dom. 70084
Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →