Osteoporosis, bone & mineral

Brief, Low-impact, High-intensity Osteogenic Loading in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Quasi-experimental Case-series Study

J Clin Endocrinol MetabPublished Quasi-experimental case-series study

An erratum to this article was published (J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 7 Aug 2025 ↗)

Authors' conclusion

The Osteostrong® intervention showed modest lumbar spine BMD improvements over 12 months; some subgroup effects were significant but not when Bonferroni-adjusted, warranting cautious interpretation and further randomized trials.

Study context

Population
Peri-/postmenopausal women with osteoporosis; group A (Osteostrong®, n=75) and group B (no Osteostrong®, n=72)
Participants
147 women
Comparison
Osteostrong® vs no Osteostrong®
Outcome
Changes in BMD and TBS in the lumbar spine and/or hip
Follow-up
12 months
Methodological detailsBonferroni-adjusted non-parametric paired tests
  • Bonferroni-adjusted non-parametric paired tests

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Lumbar spine BMD, mean paired change (within-subgroup)
GroupValueBonferroni-adjusted p
G2mean 0.029 g/cm²p < 0.001
G4mean 0.025 g/cm²p = 0.05

Value

G2mean 0.029 g/cm²
G4mean 0.025 g/cm²

Bonferroni-adjusted p

G2p < 0.001
G4p = 0.05

Further findings

OutcomeG2
Total hip left BMD, mean paired change (within-subgroup) · 12 monthsmean 0.028 g/cm²
Bonferroni-adjusted pp = 0.05

Other within-group changes (femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), total hip BMD, trabecular bone score (TBS)) · 12 months

Did not retain significance after Bonferroni correction

Original publication

Brief, Low-impact, High-intensity Osteogenic Loading in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Quasi-experimental Case-series Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Published 7 February 2025. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaf077

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.