Diabetes technology

Adolescent‐Initiated Retrospective Glucose Data Review is Associated With Improved Glycemia in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Pediatr DiabetesPublished Cross-sectional study

Authors' conclusion

Self-report of retrospective glucose data review was associated with improved glycemia as measured by HbA1c and TIR. Adolescent-initiated glucose data self-review does not appear to be driven by fear of hypoglycemia (FoH).

Study context

Population
Adolescents aged 12–18 years with T1Dof 218 eligible (51%)
Participants
112 adolescents
Exposure
Self-reported retrospective glucose data reviewers vs nonreviewers
Outcome
Prevalence of self-reported retrospective glucose data review
Methodological detailssurvey with electronic medical record review
  • Survey with electronic medical record review

Main finding

As reported in the abstract

Self-reported retrospective glucose data review

Adolescents reporting retrospective glucose data review

53%

Of reviewers, reviewed data regularly

88%

Observational data: associations, not effects.

Further findings

OutcomeP value
Glycemia: HbA1c and TIRReviewers vs Nonreviewers · HbA1c; improved glycemia with reviewP = 0.006
Glycemia: HbA1c and TIRReviewers vs Nonreviewers · TIR; improved glycemia with reviewP = 0.04

Factors associated with review status

Age, sex, race, type of insurance and CGM use not associated with retrospective review status

Hypoglycemia Fear Survey scores

No difference in Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS) scores between reviewers and nonreviewers, incl. behavioral subscale, worry subscale and total score

Original publication

Adolescent‐Initiated Retrospective Glucose Data Review is Associated With Improved Glycemia in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Pediatr Diabetes. Published 24 October 2024. doi:10.1155/2024/5218915

Composed by AI from the published abstract and checked against it. How Briefs are made →

Get them every week

New studies on this topic in My Week and in your Monday e-mail.

We e-mail you a sign-in link and a code. No password, no spam.